|
Rubric for
Theoretical Application Project Student Name(s)________________________________ Final
Recommended Grade________ |
|||||
|
Skill
Level |
Research, Development, Analysis and
Synthesis of Theory 25% |
Application
of Theory 25% |
APA Documentation and Citations 10% |
Overall Project Design and Written Presentation 20% |
Workplace Deliverable Product/Process/Plan 20% |
|
4 |
Student
gathered information from a variety of quality electronic and print sources,
including appropriate licensed databases. Sources are relevant, balanced and
include critical readings relating to the topic or problem. (seven or more)--
Primary sources were included (if appropriate). Information is logically and
creatively organized with smooth transitions. |
Student
carefully analyzed the information collected and drew appropriate and
inventive conclusions supported by evidence. Voice of the student writer is
evident in the application of concepts in this section. All appendices were discussed and clearly were
related to the project’s outcome. |
Student
documented all sources. Sources are properly cited, both in-text/in-product
and on Works-Cited/Works-Consulted pages/slides. Reference
page meets the required APA standards. |
Student
posed a thoughtful, creative question or identified a relevant business
situation that led to challenging or provocative research. Documentation
is error-free and is in the required TAP format including all completed TAP
forms. |
Student
effectively and creatively used appropriate methodology in the development of
the project deliverable. Product displays creativity and originality and has
clear value for the workplace. |
|
3 |
Student
gathered information from a variety of relevant sources (seven or more)-- print
and electronic. Student logically organized the information and made good
connections and ideas well syntherized. |
Student’s
application section shows a good effort was made in analyzing the information
collected and relating this information to the deliverable. All appendices were
identified in this section. |
Student documented
sources with some care, Sources are cited, both in-text/in-product and on
Works-Cited/Works-Consulted pages/slides. A few APA
citation errors were noted in the document and on the reference page. |
Student
posed a focused question or identified a relevant business situation that led
to acceptable research. The
overall document contains a few grammatical errors or some TAP forms are not
completed. |
Student
effectively communicated the results of research in the development of
project deliverable. Final project deliverable provides documented benefits
to the workplace. |
|
2 |
Student
gathered information from a limited range of sources (five to seven), or
displayed minimal effort in selecting quality resources. Student could have
put greater effort into organizing the information found in the research. |
Student’s
conclusions could be supported by stronger evidence. Level of analysis could
have been deeper or had a limited
relationship to the project. There was a lack of clear linking between the
project’s objective and materials included in the appendices. |
Student
needed to use greater care in documenting sources. Documentation was poorly
constructed or absent in most cases. APA
formatting errors were found on the reference page. |
Student
constructed a question or project that lends itself to readily available
answers or solutions in the workplace. The written
narrative is less than acceptable and indicates a lack of proofing and
editing. Some TAP forms are missing or
not completed as required. |
Student
needed to work on communicating more effectively the results of this
project. However, some tangible
benefits for the workplace are noted. |
|
1 |
Student
gathered information that lacked relevance, quality, depth and balance. Student
work is not logically or effectively structured. Presentation
in this section lacks any evidence of synthesis on meaning from the research. |
Student’s
conclusions simply involved restating information. Conclusions were not
supported by evidence. There was no relationship to the project or there was
no documented relationship to the materials included in the appendices. |
Student lack
an understanding for the required academic citations and attribution when using
work by other authors. Citations
and reference page clearly do not meet APA standards. |
Student
developed a question requiring little creative thought. The
written document has grammar and spelling errors that cause a lack of
understanding for the reader. TAP
forms are missing or the student failed to document the required effort, and
this shows that the student did not devote adequate attention to this
project. |
Student
showed little evidence of original work. Product does not provide any tangible
benefits for the workplace, or the final product is not the work of the
student. |